

By Gretchen Webster
WESTPORT — A plan to redesign Parker Harding Plaza’s parking lot, under review for years, is finally ready to move forward for consideration by town board and commissions.
The latest version of the plan — unveiled last month — keeps the cut-through road between Main Street and Post Road East, and restores several parking spaces removed in a previous iteration.
The proposal is a compromise between a plan proposed in June by the Downtown Plan Implementation Committee, and its critics, who fiercely objected to eliminating the cut-through road and what they argued would be the loss of too many parking spaces.
“Our work on this area is pretty much concluded,” DPIC Chairman Randy Herbertson said of the Parker Harding plan at the group’s Thursday meeting.
The committee will probably next work on plans to redesign the Jesup Green area, he said, followed by the Imperial Avenue parking lot. Upgrading the Baldwin lot on Elm Street was completed in July 2022.
The Jesup plans should make up for a loss of parking spots in Parker Harding, Herberston said. “We have a firm commitment to gain more spaces in Jesup.”
He explained that no matter what critics or town officials think about various parking options, the facilities have to comply with fire codes, federal ADA accessibility regulations and other state and local standards.
By changing the position of trash bins in the Parker Harding lot, “we are actually squeezing out a few more spots,” he said.
The June proposal would have allotted about 160 parking spaces, and the revised plan now calls for about 188 spots in the Parker Harding revamped lot. “They will be compliant” with all codes, he said. “It will be much safer, with better traffic control.”
The Parker Harding plan will now pass through “about 11 town review committees,” including the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Board of Finance, the Representative Town Meeting and the Board of Selectwomen, he said. That process is expected to extend at least until spring of 2024. All of those sessions will be conducted in public, where time for comments from residents will be incorporated into the record, he said.
A lack of clear communication between DPIC and downtown merchants and residents has been a frequent criticism of the committee, and arose again during Thursday’s meeting.
Nancy Kail, an RTM member from District 9, which includes the downtown area, referenced the controversy over the earlier plan and said, “Now will you take this education and have a good flow of information back and forth? How will you make that process work for all of us?”
Herbertson said DPIC had done its work in public from the beginning of the planning process, which in addition to the committee’s regular meetings included several brainstorming “charrettes” and information posted on the DPIC website. The panel’s Aug. 22 charrette, where the compromise Parker Harding plan was presented for public review, was successful and drew a crowd of more than 100 people, he said.
At that event, 93 comments on the project were collected on index cards and online, Town Engineer Keith Wilberg, said at Thursday’s meeting. He posted all of the comments on the DPIC website.
One-third of the comments about the compromise plan were positive, one-third were negative and the remaining third were what Wilberg called “no action.” Those suggestions included features such as a pedestrian walkway across the river, a tiered parking garage or a cantilevered walkway, none of which is included in the plan.
Freelance writer Gretchen Webster, a Fairfield County journalist and journalism teacher for many years, was editor of the Fairfield Minuteman newspaper for 10 years and teaches journalism at Southern Connecticut State University.



I am going to go to Parker Harding this morning to count and measure all spots.
Perpendicular parking is a disaster in practice as anyone who has ever tried to get into one of those types of spots knows.
What perpendicular parking does is it squeezes in a bunch of “extra” spots so it looks like we are not losing as many spots.
There needs to be all day loading zones in the plaza. From 8-6 as exist right now.
A 6-10 loading zone is like suggesting children’s sports should be scheduled from midnight to 4am.
Why is the imperial lot not being renovated first.
It is in far worse condition than Parker Harding. It is where the town and DPIC are suggesting we park our staff, and customers now that “in town “ spots are for the most part timed at 3 hours.
Imperial is currently not needed or at least not used as a parking lot for the downtown because it is not downtown.
Therefore it is the perfect parking lot to start renovating.
It is outside of the major traffic area of downtown.
There is plenty space to store equipment while it is being renovated, and made safe and secure with lights, cameras , resurfaced, and a shuttle bus. It is also the by far and away least expensive lot to complete.
Once the imperial lot is renovated, then at least WHILE, other lots are being rehabbed in the downtown, and are completely inaccessible for parking, then the imperial lot can take the overflow.
This is a no brainer.
Hmmm I wonder why it is being completely dissed and ignored as the only order of business that makes any sense.
Is it because DPIC did not think about it first? I doubt it.
I think there’s a very suspect urgency associated with doing parker Harding first even though the same folks on DPIC claim this has been 10 years in the works.
Fix imperial so merchants customers, and merchants staff have somewhere to park when other parking lots have been closed for rehab and maintenance.
The other option is to leave Parker Harding as it is. And just do maintenance on it.
If it were resurfaced and some minor tweaks with some waterfront beautifying, we can preserve the precious hard to come by parking merchants and businesses have unanimously said they need in order to survive.
This plan is detrimental to our downtown businesses and to our residents and visitors who will visit to eat and shop and not be able to find a parking spot.
I sincerely hope that our elected P&Z, BOF, and rtm will take into account the views of the majority of the town who elected them and are overwhelmingly not in favor of this plan, as petitions, and letters all Foiable, have proven.
I’m not sure why a tiny group of appointed and not elected people are choosing to obstinately ignore the will of the majority.
One last important comment, I am so grateful as are we all esp D9 for Sal Liccione who brought this to our attention and finally after months and months of begging his rtm associates in d9 for their support, finally ( with the election in November looming,)
Nancy kail changed her stance on it, and decided the access road and parking was after all important.
I know Sal Liccione up until a few months ago was the ONLY d9 rtm opposed to the plan to get rid of the access road.
It’s great that others have followed him now or at least one, and are no longer ignoring their residents and voters.
Ciara