

By Gretchen Webster
WESTPORT — The Parks and Recreation Commission voted Monday to move the Westport Community Gardens off the Long Lots Elementary School property to make way for an athletic field, despite hearing options that might save the gardens and permit construction of the field.
The commission will choose a site to move the gardens “at a location to be determined” at a future meeting, the panel said in its resolution.
The parks and recreation vote came in the wake of the recent recommendation by the Long Lots School Building Committee, later endorsed by First Selectwoman Jennifer Tooker, to construct a new elementary school on the Hyde Lane property, along with a larger athletic field that would supplant the two-decade-old gardens. Under that scenario, the community gardens would be relocated to the town-owned Baron’s South property.

Alternatives to the recommended plan for moving the gardens, presented at the meeting by members of the public, included:
- Move the weekly Westport Farmers Market from the town’s Imperial Avenue parking lot to a beach or church parking lot and build a new athletic field there.
- Put the athletic field where the existing Long Lots building now stands, once it is demolished after the new school is completed.
- Construct additional athletic fields in Winslow Park or at Hendricks Point on the Longshore Club Park property.
In the end, however, the three members of the commission present for the vote, approved the building committee’s plan to construct the new school on the site of an existing baseball field on the Hyde Lane property and to build a new field where the gardens are located.
The decision to “move” the gardens, the gardeners and their supporters have argued for months, effectively destroys them.
“If we lose [an athletic] field it’s gone … by eliminating a multi-purpose field I think we’re sending a message to all the citizens and, most importantly, children, that recreation and physical activity are not important to this town,” commission Chairman David Floyd said before the vote.
“I also believe that with our affirmation and our support we can find a more suitable location for the community gardens,” he added.
High demand for athletic fields
Several representatives of athletic organizations and leagues spoke about the difficulty of scheduling use of athletic fields and the poor condition of some town fields because of repeated use.
“The issue of overuse has become a big problem,” said Jim Wolf, president of the Westport Soccer Association. When fields are not allowed to rest between use, “they turn into mud pits. They are unsafe … soccer is a sport everyone plays,” he said.
A list of alternative sites to relocate the Long Lots athletic field and the gardens, issued in September by Parks and Recreation Director Jennifer Fava, also was reviewed at the meeting. Other possible locations considered for an athletic field included the Lillian Wadsworth Arboretum on Woodside Lane and Winslow Park, while alternate sites for the gardens, it said, could be Baron’s South, Winslow Park, Riverside Park and the Wadsworth Arboretum.
But “there’s really no other locations that are appropriate to build new fields,” Fava told the commission. “No one is supporting elimination of the garden, but removing the [Long Lots] field” would result in one less athletic field in a town already short on fields.
Commission asked to wait on garden recommendation
Many of the speakers at the meeting said they would like the commission to split its decision on the issue —immediately approving construction of the new school as the Long Lots Building Committee recommended, but taking more time to sort out whether the gardens or the athletic field should remain on Hyde Lane.
They called it a “win-win situation” to find another location for the athletic field in order to preserve the gardens.
Kristin Schneeman, a Representative Town Meeting member from District 9, was among those asking the commission to take more time to consider alternative solutions and to postpone Wednesday’s vote. “It feels like there’s a lot of catch-up going on,” she said. “It’s like Parker Harding [parking lot redesign]. We don’t have a holistic view.”
The latest plan to revamp that downtown parking lot, another recent controversial issue, earlier Monday was pulled from consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission after it got a skeptical review by the P&Z last week.
Parks and Recreation Commission members present for Monday’s meeting — Floyd, Chrissy O’Keeffe and Alec Stevens — seemed to be leaning toward splitting their vote into two sessions to gather more input as several speakers suggested, until Jay Keenan, chairman of the Long Lots committee, said that postponing any part of the plan while more options were investigated would only delay the project and ultimately cost the town more.
Discussion turns emotional
The meeting got emotional at times when both the gardeners and school parents spoke.
Gardener Irmgard Gwilliam told the commission that she and her husband felt that older people were being ignored in Westport.
“We’re all talking about the children here,” she said. “No one is talking for us and for our garden. Who is talking about older people who get such pleasure out of the gardens?”
Tara McCarthy, of Clapboard Hill Road, said the tension between the gardeners and the proponents of more athletic fields is creating “a sad discussion. It feels like a war and we’re losing the battle,” she said.
Long Lots parents said a new building to replace the 70-year-old school — which has the largest enrollment of the town’s elementary schools — is desperately needed. Children should come first, they argued.
“We need another school ASAP,” said Veronica Tyson, a mother of Long Lots students. “We’re already in a very tight situation.”
Before the commission opened Monday’s meeting for public comments, Floyd said comments would be heard on whether to approve the Long Lots Building Committee’s recommendation and not for a discussion of other possible future sites for an athletic field or the gardens, which would take place at a future commission meeting.
Baron’s South contaminated?
But he allowed John Suggs, of the Westport Preservation Alliance and a District 9 RTM candidate, to speak first since Suggs had placed an array of large photos and charts of the Baron’s South property at the front of the Town Hall auditorium.
Suggs was critical of the recommendation by the Long Lots committee and Tooker that the community gardens be relocated to Baron’s South. He said toxic fill has been dumped on the property, including petroleum products, “some form of asbestos” and arsenic, requiring enormous amounts of remediation and expense for the property to be used. “This is what the first selectwoman recommended,” he said.
After Suggs’s comments, no other speakers came forward to recommend use of the Baron’s property for the gardens.
Freelance writer Gretchen Webster, a Fairfield County journalist and journalism teacher for many years, was editor of the Fairfield Minuteman newspaper for 10 years and teaches journalism at Southern Connecticut State University.


Who needs old people?! Disgraceful. Wish Bill Meyer was still around to remind us that we need to balance and respect the interest of both the kids and the seniors, something he did very well.
This entire process has been truly obnoxious.
Everyone in town acknowledges the need for an either improved/brand new school.
And the pro community garden residents have had to constantly start every conversation stating this is not about having to choose one or the other.
And it is not ! They can both co exist.
I am still wondering why there is any good reason to destroy the ONLY community garden in town and replace it with a soccer and baseball field not even for use by the children at long lots school, who will be getting back all their fields anyway.
This is a land grab. Plain and simple.
It is OUTRAGEOUS.
The audacity of PRC is mind blowing.
A very keen eye needs to be kept on following the longshore plans because I suspect we are in for some shockers there.
I hope we have all learnt a valuable lesson here and it’s to keep a very watchful eye on anything going on in our town, because even if you think it won’t effect you today, it might tomorrow.
I suggest a very watchful eye be kept on the following
LONGSHORE PLANS
All of them, tennis courts, pools, pickleball court placement, golf clubhouse, and most of all the INN AT LONGSHORE, just to ensure our town jewel that is the entire park is not used by the ( Westport based investment fund ( the majority shareholder) running the inn for the next 35 years, like it is their own property.
Stake holders in longshore are the 28,000 residents of Westport.
Let’s not forget that.
PARKER HARDING and OTHER LOTS
The 8-24 has been withdrawn from P and Z and no doubt shortly after the election will be resubmitted, we hope as a shadow of its disastrous self.
The parking lot needs a lot of maintenance, filling of pot holes, and to maintain its current number of angled parking spots and thru road. It also needs more ADA spots and crossroads.
It has purposely been allowed to go unmaintained, so those very few proponents in favor of the plan can point out its disrepair. When you do not maintain something this is what happens. It’s no different than a roadway or your driveway.
On top of that the imperial lot should be the next parking lot to be “fixed”, it will cause the least amount of traffic during construction, it will cost the least amount of revenue, and it will provide 150 parking spots which can be used by residents, visitors, and the merchants during the “fixing” of our downtown lots.
It is in by far the worst condition, and needs to be made safe, lit, and with cameras and a shuttle.
COMMUNITY GARDENS
Our precious one and only award winning community garden used and enjoyed by so many of our residents and tax payers, and available to the teachers and students at long lots, should be left where it is, fully accessible during construction.
SOCCER/BASEBALL FIELD
this new field should be placed in any of the suggested locations for the community gardens. There after all should be plenty room. This will save the town, the hundreds of thousands of dollars which it will cost to tear the gardens down and start again.
I suggest everyone stay very awake and aware of the above, and I apologize if I have missed any other important matters.
Ciara
Bill Meyer was a great guy. My dad introduced me to him at church. Of course, i already knew him as the father of one of my best friends, Erik Meyer, the co captain of the basketball team at Staples.Man oh man the stories I could tell. But anyway his dad, Bill, became one of Westport’s treasures. Public service was his thing. Bill Meyer introduced me to Chris Shays who I intereewed for Westport news blog. Chris told about the time he got elected to congress and ronald reagan called to congradulate him at Oscar’s.
Spot-on,Ciara. We need to keep a vigilant eye .That said, lately in every instance from the Gardens to the Linxweiler family legacy, our words fall on deaf ears. I greatly admire those who lose their voices arguing in town meetings to no avail. I hate to compare it to voting in Communist regimes where the outcome is pre-determined before the votes are cast. That too gives the illusion of democracy.
This week the Journal broke the story of the Ambassador of Kuwait being univited to speak at the library. I shudder to think what other matters are being decided behind closed doors.
The schoolsystem is failing but someone just awarded Scarice a $312K three year contract. The First Selectwoman is content to accept a 6 figure salary but defer to TEAM Westport to decide our fate.The library board insulted an Ambassador of the UN, and the fate of the Parker Harding parking lot still hangs by a thread. What magic does it take to pickup garbage everyday and remove the unsightly dumpster?
Caroline, In what factual ways is the school system failing? The same school system you thought until last week didn’t give grades and just hugs because Camilo Riano told you so. The school system isn’t failing. And in what conrete ways is Jen Tooker letting TEAM Westport determine our fate. These are all just broad based boogey man scare tactics. Dare I say dog whistles….
Caroline. I sit on the BOE and have been a vocal supporter of our Superintendent’s contract extension and the specific pay award. I sit in meetings several times a months and ask hard questions of Mr Scarice and his administration that no doubt frustrate him on many occasions. Happy to talk to you on the phone or meet you and lend my clear 100% support and justification for the renumeration you refer to. I am happy to do that with any resident / taxpayer. I am not running in any election. Please email me at rharrington@westportps.org and we can set it up. Thanks.
As a friend of mine stated recently, so truthfully and succinctly; the biggest lie being perpetuated throughout this Town by the current administration is that a choice is required; either the Community Gardens or a baseball field on the Long Lots site.
No choice is required, we have documented and circulated two site plan options that illustrate maintaining the the gardens in their current location and the construction a new ball field in either one of two proposed locations on the site, while leaving the proposed new school where the architects sited it on the land. I also proposed three other suitable locations for baseball fields, yet all I’ve heard is crickets.
The unwillingness of the current administration to work with the community is mind boggling and clearly illustrates an administration incapable of leadership, while both ironically and humorously, constantly calling for civil discourse. The people are speaking and you are not listening.
Yes Joe Vallone, yes Caroline Bennett, and NO, Lauren McNeill.
See what you don’t seem to grasp here Lauren is the corruption disguised as a school.
Please do remember you are speaking with fellow tax payers.. who will vote accordingly.
And some of us are sick and tired of the school getting shoved down our necks, along with a new field. One that 90% of the town has zero interest in
Everyone is in favor of a nice shiny renovated school. BUT, and it’s a big big but, have some respect for the gardening community. They pay for your shiny new school.
We all do.
So yes be very very aware that WE ALL get the privilege of paying for your shiny new school, and some of us want a seat at the table to just make sure that we have a handle on the unscrupulous crap that’s going along with the shiny new school.
For example maybe the shiny new vanity project should get reigned in. Just a tad( I jest)
Maybe just maybe this insane over reach by llsbc and PRC is sitting at about choke /vomit level with some of us.
For example… lose the ball field !!! Pick Lauren ! The school and ball field do not go hand in hand. What do you want ? Huh ? A new shiny school, or a new shiny school delayed because of a ball field.
2 very separate agenda items made to look like one by shady non elected committees
So please enlighten us tax payers to what you want ?
New school/renovated school…
Or new school and ball field ?
Please remember when you do your eeny, meeny, miny, Mo , that the school and ball field are seperate. In fact the ball field is NOT for use by your long lots children.
Ms. Webster, I said nothing in my comment above about gardens or the LLS school. I was addressing Caroline’s comments about our school system failing and TEAM control over the town. She went off topic and I was addressing her given we have an extremely important BoE election and lots of misinformation.
I’m a baseball mom and not a gardener, in fact I wasn’t aware before all of this that the gardens even existed. However, I’ve written in several times on Dan’s blog to comment that as a baseball mom with some knowledge of the current fields and their usage, that I questioned if a new field was needed at all. And I’ve said unequivocally that they should not go on top of a 20 year garden. FYI, I don’t have a LL child but do have a teenage boy that plays baseball and I’ve still taken this position, as have others who do have LL children.
We should renovate one of our current lacking Babe Ruth baseball fields and we should support our assets such as the garden and be respectful of our neighbors. The gardens have more usage than the new Babe Ruth field would have.
I have respect for my neighbors. You should show the same courtesy. We all also have choices in what restaurants we frequent.
Caroline brought up several points amongst them the Parker Harding lot, and the dissing of the Kuwait Ambassador.
I am not knowledgeable on TEAM Westport nor what the school superintendent earns.
I certainly apologize for my incorrectly tying your response on team Westport and Mr. Scarice to support or lack of support of the gardens and the other disingenuous goings on in this town.
And you are correct that this upcoming election is incredibly important for all town boards and RTM in fact, not just BOE.
It was wrong of me to make such an assumption, especially since you have been a vocal garden supporter. And I do sincerely apologize.
As to restaurant choices in Westport, we are lucky we have so many amazing options.
In the interest of full disclosure, I am a corporate attorney in Manhattan, not an educator, not a social worker and definitely not a bleeding heart liberal. Sharon Wylie, in one of her brilliant comments, referred to Westport as an aspirational town. I agree with that assessment. Furthermore, the concept of self sacrifice in order to eventually buy something albeit a new car or a home is motivating. The notion that no child be left behind, a child’s future should not be determined by his zip code, is one currently embraced. So we are busing in students from areas where parents cannot afford to give them breakfast and lunch and having them sit alongside students who spend winter recess in Gstaad. I see this as a potential powder keg.
As for the school system declining, we slipped from first place. The percentage of math proficiency is 76%. The average SAT score was 1320 according to Niche (https://www.niche.com/k12/staples-high-school-westport-ct/). Just 83% of the kids say they feel safe at school. Only 69% of students agree they like their school and feel happy there. Given this report card, I would not have voted Scarice a raise and a three year contract.
Our school system is not failing Carol! Quite the contrary! We are a TOP rated school district in CT and the entire US! This is why Neil and Lee will win again along with write in Jill Dillon! Congratulations Westport Schools, Neil, Lee and Tom! Our votes are for you all keeping our district an inspiration to all.
I hear friends talking about how they want to move here for our schools. We are known by colleges theoughout the country for our rigorous academics, arts, athletics and teaching to the whole child. Bravo! I love Westport Schools!