
By Gretchen Webster
WESTPORT — A firm has been hired to compile data for the Long Lots School Building Committee on school construction costs in nearby towns to help plan a budget for Westport’s newest elementary school.
Information collected by the firm, Colliers Project Leaders USA, will help the committee compare costs and devise “benchmarks” for a tentative budget before the Long Lots Elementary School project is put up for bids, Donald O’Day, a committee member and Representative Town Meeting member from District 3, told the Board of Selectwomen on Wednesday.
“The costs for this agreement are capped at $10,000 … and it is going to be covered by the $400,000 appropriation that was already made for the groundwork for the Long Lots Building Committee back in 2022,” O’Day said.
Early, overall cost for the new Long Lots, which will replace the seven-decade-old school on Hyde Lane, have been estimated to be between $90 to $100 million.
Although the selectwomen approved the agreement unanimously, Jennifer Johnson, a District 9 RTM member, questioned O’Day’s statement that “some of the data will probably have to be presented in executive session.” Freedom of Information laws might require that the information be presented at a public meeting, not executive session, Johnson said.
“I encourage you to make sure that we are following our FOIA [Freedom of Information Act] laws, whether or not we can go into executive session regarding the public being able to know the benchmark costs for this project,” Johnson said.
O’Day explained that although the Colliers’ data about costs associated with designing and constructing schools in other communities would be public, the committee does not want to disclose its tentative budget figures for the Long Lots project before bidding begins. Information regarding exactly how much the town might be willing to spend on a particular part of the project could skew the bids higher, he said.
“We would want the trades coming in to bid … to not have the exact price that we had budgeted for,” O’Day told the meeting. Similar executive sessions between the building committee and Board of Finance leaders were used successfully during the recent Coleytown Middle School reconstruction project, he added.
Few exemptions in the FOI regulations permit public building projects to be discussed in executive sessions, according to Russell Blair, director of education and communication for the Connecticut Freedom of Information Commission.
Certain draft documents would be exempt from regulations governing executive sessions, he said, but budget documents would likely not qualify.
However, Nicholas Bamonte, an attorney with the Bercham Moses law firm contracted through the Town Attorney’s Office, said the executive sessions described by O’Day may be considered exempt to the open meetings law, qualifying either as discussions of a draft proposal, as negotiating sessions or as meetings that involve the bidding process.
Bamonte, who specializes in Freedom of Information law, added that he had not been contacted by town officials about the question and was not giving a definitive opinion in response to questions from the Westport Journal.
Freelance writer Gretchen Webster, a Fairfield County journalist for many years, was editor of the Fairfield Minuteman and has taught journalism at New York and Southern Connecticut State universities.


Not sure why the secrecy. The bidding process for public improvements is a public process.
A negotiation about land acquisition? A labor contract? A personnel matter? Litigation? These are reasons for a public agency to hold executive sessions.
Reviewing competitive benchmarks requested by the Board of Finance doesn’t fit the bill.
The CT F. O.I.A. Law Section 1-200 (6) defines specific situations for executive sessions. Section 1-210 defines documents excluded from disclosure; none of which appear likely here,
This, the THIRD improper attempt for the LLSBC to hold an executive session since June, and should be challenged and stopped..
What happened to the transparency to which the town is so committed. I am still awaiting records from my FOIA request dated 11/1/23 on this same time sensitive matters.
The process being followed for implementation of this project has no rhyme or reason. One other thing: the town attorney did opine upon previously is that the Public School and Building Commission is charged with overseeing the implementation phase of an appointed school building committee.
Here is that aforementioned legal memo.
https://www.westportct.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/83720/638379056461070000
Dear Westporters,
For two years, I have been asking for public records. I have been in front of the FOI Commission in Hartford twice and soon for the third time. Recently, I met with the First Selectwoman to tell her about my experience with her law firm, Berchem Moses. It is time to reach out to the RTM and let more people look at the facts so everyone can form an opinion. Let me know if you have any experience in front of the RTM or like to help in any other way. Also, if you would like to get a ‘behind the scene’ look at FOI in our town in practical terms, I created a What App Group and am happy to share it – not sure if it works, but I usually don’t have time, and the patience to read or write long stories.
One last thing: Why should you care? Yesterday, our Attorney General filed a PFAS lawsuit against several chemical companies. In simplified terms, Westport’s two wellfields, Canal Street and Coleytown, have been above the PFAS limit for years, essentially providing contaminated drinking water. It is a costly but easy fix. As we are not complaining and demanding change, nothing will happen until it is required. You did not know? It is not in everyone’s interest for you to know.
Disclaimer: I am not on any town board or commission nor am I affiliated with a political party. I happen to live near the water tanks by Staples HS; as such, together with a few others, I had a chance to follow the issue a bit.
Marc
marclemcke@me.com
Thank you, Jen Johnson, for urging appropriate transparency here. I don’t know about other communities, but for some reason, here in Westport, I have observed that FOI is often treated as more or a serving suggestion than a law.