
By Thane Grauel
WESTPORT — A proposed ordinance regulating when and what kind of leaf blowers could be used in town came under a blistering attack Tuesday at a joint meeting of three Representative Town Meeting committees.
Parks and Recreation Director Jennifer Fava and Public Works Director Peter Ratkiewich both said that, as written, the ordinance would hinder their staffs from effectively doing their jobs.
Even if their departments were exempted from the rules, the proposal still should be rejected by the lawmakers, they indicated.
Officials: Electric vs. gas equipment not comparable
Electric leaf blowers and gas-powered leaf blowers “are not comparable,” Fava said. “They just aren’t. The technology just isn’t there.
“We’re also opposed because of the limitations of the hours, and the detrimental effects that the limitations on the number of blowers would have on our efficiency,” she said.
Sharp limits on gas-powered leaf blowers reviewed
The measure — which is undergoing revisions — would allow use of gas-powered blowers in Westport during two six-week periods annually — Nov. 1 to Dec. 15, and March 15 to April 30. They would be prohibited the rest of the year.
Electric and battery-powered leaf blowers, which are not as noisy and are less polluting, would be allowed year-round.
The proposal would grant exemptions to rules for gas-powered equipment used for golf courses and public works projects, as well as during a state of emergency.
Gas-powered blowers also would be restricted to one unit on properties smaller than an acre, two on parcels between one and two acres, and three on three-acre parcels.
Monday’s meeting involved the Environment, Public Works and Parks, and Recreation committees of the RTM.
The committees’ work session was planned primarily to get input from officials and landscaper representatives who would be affected.
Committee leaders say public comments will be considered at future meetings as review of the ordinance continues.
Park & Rec, DPW: Leaf blowers not just for leaves
Fava and Ratkiewich said the leaf blowers are used by their departments to clear far more than just leaves. The equipment is used to clear sand, dirt and other debris from sidewalks, boardwalks, pedestrian walkways, driveways, roads, tennis courts, pickleball courts and marina docks.
Electric blowers, both said, do not perform as well. Those devices lack strength, and run out of a charge in 15 to 20 minutes, they said.
“When technology improves and ELBs [electric leaf blowers] are actually comparable to GLBs [gas leaf blowers] that would be the time for us to endeavor the use of ELBs, but at this current time the technology just isn’t there,” Fava said.
“This proposed ordinance, in my opinion, is unrealistic and unacceptable for the parks and golf operations, and I urge the members of the RTM not to pass this ordinance,” she added.
Ratkiewich noted that one of the landscapers who spoke mentioned the word “handcuffed” several times.
“This ordinance, if passed, will handcuff my operation.”
“I have to tell you that it is so unrealistic, the way it was written, that you’d think these people don’t know what any labor force does,” he said.
“I maintain roads and sidewalks and pedestrian thoroughfares,” he said. “I don’t clean up leaves … the way this is written I can’t do my work.”
“Gas-powered leaf blowers are an integral part of the cleanup operation,” Ratkiewich said.
“There’s a terrible misunderstanding of what we do, how we accomplish it and why we do it,” he said.
Police concerned about enforcement
Police Chief Foti Koskinas told the committee members that he had concerns about enforcing the ordinance. He said many of the landscaping workers in the area are undocumented, and officers would have to ask for identification when responding to complaints.
That, he said, would lead to “custodial arrests” until someone could provide proof of the leaf blower operator was, tying up police officers needed elsewhere.
Landscapers: Rules would ‘handcuff’ business, boost costs
Landscapers and groundskeepers also were critical of the proposal. While many said battery-powered technology is improving, it still lags behind the utility of gas-powered blowers and is more costly.
“You cannot handcuff us in the fall,” said Bob Iannacone, who lives in Westport and owns a landscaping business. “It is just not good business, for us, for the customers, for the town.”
Using electric blowers, he said, “We will be out there forever, and we will actually lose business.”
Tony Palmer, another local landscaping business owner, said it would hurt the time and efficiency of his crews.
“We are handcuffed with regulations, performance fines and lawsuits,” he said. “I feel that if this ban is approved and moves forward by the RTM, I’d have the right to bring suit against the town of Westport, along with my colleagues.”


I realize that gas powered blowers emit undesirable amounts of pollutants. Do the folks who propose their limited usage realize that idling in their vehicles contributes just as much to poor are quality? I constantly see these offenders all through the year, sitting in their cars and suvs with the motor running Unnecessarily.
It is clear that this proposed ordinance has not been well thought out. The committee clearly has to go back to the drawing board. I have a feeling that when the public gets to comment the committee will be running for cover.
The Human Condition: Everyone wants things to get better but nobody wants anything to change.
Gas powered is over, now get over it. This is a lot of noise over nothing (pun intended)
Ask Consumers Union Testing Labs about which Electric ones compare to Gas. The change is not an “if” it’s a “when”.
Sounds like the commenters are deaf to this (pun intended). Ordinances are for the public good, what’s not good here, think about it.
Reading the comment above:
I would like to see a list of all the people who complained about the noise and where they live.
My first reaction after reading the above ordinance proposed sounds like one 1 kotch below communism.
Gerald F. Romano, Jr.
You write, “I would like to see a list of all the people who complained about the noise and where they live.” Then you follow that Big Brothery idea with an accusation about communism. I find that strange and hypocritical.
If California can do it…so can Fairfield county…and they have more in docs than us. Do they know it brooms and rake sir?
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/amp38004981/california-ban-gas-powered-lawn-equipment/
What’s next? Prohibiting snowblowers?
It is always hard to assess public support of an issue, in part because those opposed to a proposed change are commonly the most vocal. My personal sense from conversations and the reading of comments is that a gas powered blower ordinance that restricts usage will be very well received by most Westport residents. Concerns as to cost, implications as to the cleanliness of yards, walkways and other hard surfaces and public spaces and even illegal aliens need not kill this good and farsighted effort. The RTM will focus on the issues and refine aspects. There are six sponsors of this concept on the RTM. Many on the RTM have received inputs in support of minimizing the negatives, noise and the adverse environmental impacts, of gas powered machines. The lines have been pretty well drawn. Now it is up to the RTM to work out the best solution. Whether that is achieved by excluding golf courses, allowing some gas powered machines for use by public works and Parks & Rec. as truly needed, and by better investigating the private landscaping business and its concerns so that a business need not shut down because of the inability to use gas powered machines, will all be addressed. I use an electric corded machine with a 75′ cord and our outdoor outlets. My guess is an even longer cord would work and that should allow reaching the perimeters of most residential sites in Westport from an outdoor electrical outlet. Let’s figure this out and end up doing the right thing.
Agree- we have a small battery powered blower and an electric one. the corded one works as well as a gas powered one.