

By Gretchen Webster
WESTPORT — “Where are the chairs?”
That was the initial, most common reaction heard from people attending Tuesday night’s forum on new plans for the Parker Harding Plaza parking lot, hosted by the Downtown Plan Implementation Committee at the Westport Library.
The scene in the library’s Trefz Forum, where the meeting was held, had more than 20 easels with various architectural renderings of the lot, as well as charts and other schematic drawings, posted around the large, open space — without a single chair.
More than 150 attendees at the “Reconnecting the Riverfront” forum, instead were expected to mill about, perusing the visual presentations on the new plan and past proposals, to discuss them and come up with ideas and comments. Which they did.
Officials formally called the forum a “charrette,” defined by dictionary.com as “a final, intensive effort to finish a project, especially an architectural design project, before a deadline.”
Before a presentation of the DPIC plan by Public Works Director Peter Ratkiewich, many people had positive comments about revised plans for the parking lot, which would keep the cut-through road from Main Street to Post Road East.
The plan under consideration by DPIC in June, which had sparked controversy, called for removing the road and eliminating 44 parking spaces. It was “paused” by First Selectwoman Jennifer Tooker to give the committee time to prepare the new option unveiled Tuesday.
“The access road between Main Street and Post Road has been re-established,” Donald O’Day, a Representative Town Meeting member from District 3, said after seeing the newest plan. “That’s a good start. It’s a non-starter without it.”
Grayson Braun, chair of the town’s Historic District Commission who lives near the downtown area, agreed. “I’m really here to make sure about the cut-through road,” she said. “It would take me at least 20 minutes longer to do everything without it. We’ll see what happens.”
Donna Douglass, the Historic District Commission’s coordinator, doesn’t live in Westport, “but I certainly use that road. It’s essential if you have to get to Norwalk from Town Hall.”
But others, including some members of the Westport Woman’s Club, didn’t see exactly what they were looking for in the new plan. They wanted to know how the Imperial Avenue parking lot, adjacent to the club, might be affected by overall strategy for downtown parking.
The town deeded “100 spaces in perpetuity in the lot” to the club, and its members wanted to be sure that their club would be taken into account under any new downtown plans, according to Christina McVaney, former president of the club. But plans presented Tuesday didn’t include that lot, essentially focused only on the Parker Harding lot.
Downtown merchants Gina Porcello, owner of GG & Joe coffee shop off Parker Harding Plaza, and Laureen Haynes, owner of the Chocolatieree shop on Church Lane, were not happy the new plan still would reduce the number of available parking spaces.
Sal Liccione, an RTM representative from District 9, which includes the downtown area, had one comment: “We still haven’t gotten the traffic study.”
Marilyn Harding, whose father Evan Harding designed the Parker Harding lot in the 1950s, said that her dream of using the Baron’s Park South property for more parking and retail space wasn’t evident anywhere in the latest plans. The town needs much more parking, and DPIC’s August plan still takes away parking, instead of adding it, she said.
“Right now I’m parked illegally because I couldn’t find a space,” she said. “It’s a crisis.”
After the meeting, many people said that although they thought it was a good presentation, they would take a “wait-and-see” attitude as the DPIC plans evolve.
Robin Clark, current president of the Woman’s Club, said, “I think [the presentation] was great, but it’s still early for us” to find out how the Imperial lot might be affected.
Don Bergmann, who said he was involved in putting together a 2015 plan for Parker Harding, was happy with DPIC’s latest revisions. “I think the presentation was wonderful,” he said. “It’s just what the 2015 plan fully supported.
Larry and Mary Ann Grimaldi, residents of Westport for three years, live on Riverside Avenue and attended the meeting to learn the latest plans for downtown.
Mary Ann Grimaldi called the Saugatuck River “a gem … but we didn’t hear much about integrating the community as a whole” into the waterfront area.
Maxxwell Crowley, president of the Westport Downtown Association and a DPIC member, was pleased with the meeting turnout of more than 150 people.
“I thought it was a huge success,” he said. “It shows how passionate they are about the town and how much they care.”
First Selectwoman Jennifer Tooker called the gathering “an example of democracy in action,” giving citizens a good sense of latest plans for the parking lot.
Brian McGunagle, chairman of Westport Pride, said he looks forward to seeing plans for other parts of downtown, but said the new site plan “is as close as they can get to a compromise.”
After the presentation, those attending circulated around the room, checking out the sequence of design plans posted on easels, and wrote ideas on cards for the committee to study.
The ideas and comments were as varied as the people attending the event. They included:
“I feel your plan was a good compromise.”
“Remove parking from Jesup Green, and make it into a park. Westport has enough parking.”
“Respect waterfowl.”
“FEEDBACK,” in large letters.
The DPIC is expected to formally bring plans for the Parker Harding parking lot before town bodies this fall.
Freelance writer Gretchen Webster, a Fairfield County journalist and journalism teacher for many years, was editor of the Fairfield Minuteman newspaper for 10 years and teaches journalism at Southern Connecticut State University.




I was not at the charrette last night. I am currently away moving one of my children into college as are many who did not attend last night because of the inconvenient and rushed nature of this “charrette” I’m still unsure what the massive rush is all of a sudden to hurry through a disingenuous plan which is going to cause utter chaos in that parking lot and make it far less safe than it is today.
What this plan seeks to do is to try and divide the support between residents and merchants.
Course we knew that would be the “compromise”.
I am a resident and merchant. This is no compromise.
This plan does not work.
First of all angled spaces have been replaced with literally “impossible to drive into straight non angled spots”.
Second loading zones, which are an albeit necessary evil to do business in this area, must be an all day affair.
Fed ex, ups, dhl, trucks delivering food products etc, do not do it before 10am.
In fact they deliver all day, until 8pm. As we have zero control over delivery schedules, we have to assume there will be constant all day deliveries.
Loading zones must be all day long.
I certainly fully agree with providing pedestrian access via cross walks, and more accessible handicapped parking.
None of the green space being provided mitigates flooding in any way so please do not be fooled into thinking it does.
Is this plan trying to provide a buffered view of the parking lot from across the river ? Because the more I look at it, it seems to be trying to hide the unsavory view from across the river, as opposed to doing anything for the view on the PH side of the river.
I’d also like to know why certain rtm members and not the more involved rtm members had clear and prior knowledge of the details of this plan, while hiding them from the boots on the ground rtm such as for example D9 rtm Sal Liccione.
So much for transparency and doing our “business in public”
Business continues to be done through secret closed meetings excluding stakeholders and residents, and pretending to include our views whilst valuable time is being wasted holding non transparent meetings with non merchant business owners etc…
Last night should have included feedback in person by the general public and business owners and it did not.
It was another charade to try an push through a ludicrous plan, which increasingly is looking less like a plan to provide green space for the purpose of enjoyment and more like a plan to provide a buffer so buildings on the other side of the river can enjoy a buffered view of the PH parking lot and roadway.
Incidentally has anybody wondered how the employees from the Starbucks end of PH, will push heavy trash cans down to those new trash areas ? Trash removal from businesses is an all day affair.
With the new parking regulations coming into effect as early as September, and with chief Foti’s comments on thanksgiving and holidays such as Hanukkah and Christmas coming at the last meeting surely renovating the imperial lot would be a far more urgent agenda item. Provide shuttles, finish the imperial lot for safety, security and parking overflow, as it will no longer be overflow but very much a part of daily life for many.
There is zero reason to be doing Parker Harding or Jesup first before fixing the parking at imperial so that when repair and renovation happens at the downtown lots and causes us to have massive parking problems, at least the imperial lot will be available for safe, well lit, and accessible parking, including ADA compliant parking. And including a shuttle bus to ferry people from parking on the outskirts of town into town.
It is absurd to not be renovating and fixing imperial first since it is after all with the removal of parking for green space going to be a necessary parking area.
We are also still awaiting answers as to where those expected to and being forced down to the imperial lot will park on a Thursday as long as the farmers market is there, and I note from DPIC glossy online brochure will be getting a “permanent “ home there. How is that going to work on a Thursday now that timed parking is back ? And are the residents of Westport expected to build covered pavillions and bathrooms to facilitate this “permanent” home.
I’m a huge farmers market supporter but if this administration wants its green space and it’s buffers etc, and has cited imperial as the perfect new parking area, going so far as to include it in parking numbers, then those parking spots MUST be in play on a Thursday.
We do want an answer to that.
Parking is needed on thursdays also as last I checked main streets and downtowns businesses do not close on a Thursday.
All questions we have asked time and time again but they have not been answered.
Seems many many more charrette are needed in order to iron out the finer details of this plan and the order in which the Reno are carried out, again since renovating imperial will provide us then with a shuttle bus lot which during renovation will cause far less traffic chaos and provide us a place to park when the other lots are being redone